Why South Asian Sisters?
But why should it be controversial to demand that we have rights as women within our communities? Why, if many of us would oppose movies that normalize whiteness and stereotype/marginalize South Asians, for example, can we not voice criticism regarding movies that normalize masculinity and stereotype/marginalize women and members of the LGBTQ community? I have seen a number of web sites and blog spaces that claim to be "South Asian," yet systematically exclude or ridicule women who critique sexism that is considered too close to home, viz., the sexism of "assimilated" South Asian American men. Isn't that just as bad as white people telling brown people to "lighten up" and trivializing/mocking/satirizing our desire to see fair representation as "PC"? I see it as very sad when people who fully understand the need for mobilizing and empowering South Asians against racism cannot make a logical parallel between that desire and the desire of women to do the same against sexism -- or, for that matter, for people to assert rights as members of a particular class, religion, or other axis of identity.
At various times, I have sought out community in "South Asian" spaces, and when I found those to be problematic in numerous ways, sought out "feminist" spaces. Unfortunately, I found that many of those spaces were not very inclusive of my needs as a woman of color. This is because identity politics, rallying around a single axis of identity for a common struggle, are too often prone to essentialism:
In the case of identity politics, two claims stand out as plausibly “essentialist:” the first is the understanding of the subject that makes a single axis of identity stand in for the whole, as if being Asian-American, for example, were entirely separable from being a woman... The second form of essentialism is closely related to the first: generalizations made about particular social groups in the context of identity politics may come to have a disciplinary function within the group, not just describing but also dictating the self-understanding that its members should have. Thus, the supposedly liberatory new identity may inhibit autonomy, as Anthony Appiah puts it, replacing “one kind of tyranny with another” (Appiah in Gutmann ed. 1994, 163). Just as dominant groups in the culture at large insisted that the marginalized integrate by assimilating to dominant norms, so within some practices of identity politics dominant sub-groups may, in theory and practice, impose their vision of the group's identity onto all its members.
And hence, in my opinion, the need for a space like South Asian Sisters: to ensure that an androcentric vision of unity does not dominate the South Asian discourse. Granted, our group contains considerable diversity in itself, and it will be a continuous process to ensure that each voice gets heard and respected. I know that many people who read about our activities will still be prone to attacking or pigeonholing us in one way or another, especially due to the safe harbor of anonymity that the Internet provides. However, I challenge you to meet any of our members in person or attend a "Yoni Ki Baat" performance and not be completely blown away by the talent, brilliance, beauty, humor, and strength that exists in each member of this group.
1 Comments:
At 9:24 PM, Usman Awais said…
Architectural consultants in Dubai
Architecture firms in Dubai
Post a Comment
<< Home